Galen
2/25/10
DRIVEN TO DISTRACTION2/25/10
Ritchel, Matt
New York Times: Upfront
January 18, 2010
Technology/National
Page 18-19
While being able to multitask is a good thing, texting while driving can prove fatal. This has become a definite problem over the last couple of years. The law is cracking down on people who are caught texting while driving and also people who have crashed while doing it. A new national law has just been passed saying that "a texting driver who causes a fatality will be penalized just as harshly a drunk driver who causes a fatality." This means a driver of a car who has crashed and caused a death while texting can face up to 15 years in prison. One study shows that "driving while texting or talking on a cellphone while driving is at least as risky as driving with a .08 blood alcohol level, the standard for drunk driving." While a study done by Harvard students estimated that distractions caused by cellphones result in at least 2,600 traffic deaths per year. good so far -Seth Talkington 3/4/10 4:45 PM Seventeen states and the District of Columbia have banned the use of cellphones while driving except for an emergency.
There are some parts of catching and penalizing texting drivers that are much harder to do. First of all, a drunk driver can be identified with a breathalyzer, but there is no way to immediately know that a driver was texting. One way to see when the driver was last texting is to check the cellphone records but lawyers and the defendants of people caught say that is violating the Fourth Amendment segments of privacy and is called "unreasonable searches and seizures."maybe you should state the fourth amendmant in this -Seth Talkington 3/4/10 4:46 PM
I definitely agree that there should be a penalty for people driving while texting and causing a death. The amount of time the people should serve in federal and state prisons is up in the air depending on the severity of the crash, but if someone kills someone else the punishment should be just as harsh as was said before . I am glad that texting while driving has been banned in 17 states, but hopefully in the near future, it will be banned in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Another thing that should be banned is texting while driving with the person in the passenger seat steering . This is even harder to catch but if there is a way to do it, it should be done. The person who is texting still has to work the accelerator and brake pedals. The person who is working those might not brake if the person in front of them brakes, or may be going too fast or too slow. All of those could cause a death, the person might argue they're not driving but they are in charge of how fast they're going. This is an issue that should be talked about and thought about because this is an extreme hazard.
Discussion Questions: If you were someone who was convicted of texting while driving and the feds had to check your cell phone's history, would you feel like it is breaking the promise about privacy in the Fourth Amendment?
January 18, 2010
Technology/National
Page 18-19
While being able to multitask is a good thing, texting while driving can prove fatal. This has become a definite problem over the last couple of years. The law is cracking down on people who are caught texting while driving and also people who have crashed while doing it. A new national law has just been passed saying that "a texting driver who causes a fatality will be penalized just as harshly a drunk driver who causes a fatality." This means a driver of a car who has crashed and caused a death while texting can face up to 15 years in prison. One study shows that "driving while texting or talking on a cellphone while driving is at least as risky as driving with a .08 blood alcohol level, the standard for drunk driving." While a study done by Harvard students estimated that distractions caused by cellphones result in at least 2,600 traffic deaths per year. good so far -Seth Talkington 3/4/10 4:45 PM Seventeen states and the District of Columbia have banned the use of cellphones while driving except for an emergency.
There are some parts of catching and penalizing texting drivers that are much harder to do. First of all, a drunk driver can be identified with a breathalyzer, but there is no way to immediately know that a driver was texting. One way to see when the driver was last texting is to check the cellphone records but lawyers and the defendants of people caught say that is violating the Fourth Amendment segments of privacy and is called "unreasonable searches and seizures."maybe you should state the fourth amendmant in this -Seth Talkington 3/4/10 4:46 PM
I definitely agree that there should be a penalty for people driving while texting and causing a death. The amount of time the people should serve in federal and state prisons is up in the air depending on the severity of the crash, but if someone kills someone else the punishment should be just as harsh as was said before . I am glad that texting while driving has been banned in 17 states, but hopefully in the near future, it will be banned in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Another thing that should be banned is texting while driving with the person in the passenger seat steering . This is even harder to catch but if there is a way to do it, it should be done. The person who is texting still has to work the accelerator and brake pedals. The person who is working those might not brake if the person in front of them brakes, or may be going too fast or too slow. All of those could cause a death, the person might argue they're not driving but they are in charge of how fast they're going. This is an issue that should be talked about and thought about because this is an extreme hazard.
Discussion Questions: If you were someone who was convicted of texting while driving and the feds had to check your cell phone's history, would you feel like it is breaking the promise about privacy in the Fourth Amendment?